Hi, On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 01:40:51PM +0100, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote: > On 02/27/2013 01:31 PM, Felipe Balbi wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 01:27:07PM +0100, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote: > >> In patch "5d3c28b usb: otg: add device tree support to otg library" > >> devm_usb_get_phy_by_phandle() was added. It uses try_module_get() to lock > >> the > >> phy driver in memory. The corresponding module_put() is missing in that > >> patch. > >> > >> This patch adds try_module_get() to usb_get_phy() and usb_get_phy_dev(). > >> Further the missing module_put() is added to usb_put_phy(). > >> > >> Reviewed-by: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kis...@ti.com> > >> Acked-by: Felipe Balbi <ba...@ti.com> > >> Signed-off-by: Marc Kleine-Budde <m...@pengutronix.de> > >> Signed-off-by: Michael Grzeschik <m.grzesc...@pengutronix.de> > > > > this one doesn't apply to my tree. What did you use as a base ? > > As stated in the cover letter: Greg's usb-next. > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gregkh/usb.git > > I'd really appreciate if this series goes into a single tree. So that > other chipidea developers can base their work on this.
it eventually will all go through Greg's queue, but drivers/usb/phy and drivers/usb/otg/ needs to go through my tree so we avoid conflicts later, sorry. -- balbi
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
