Hello.

On 06-03-2013 21:47, Felipe Balbi wrote:

that way we will only tell gadget framework about
the endpoints we actually have.

Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi <[email protected]>
---
  drivers/usb/dwc3/gadget.c | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
  1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/usb/dwc3/gadget.c b/drivers/usb/dwc3/gadget.c
index 8e53acc..aad941f 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/dwc3/gadget.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/dwc3/gadget.c
@@ -1623,14 +1623,15 @@ static const struct usb_gadget_ops dwc3_gadget_ops = {

  /* -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 
*/

-static int dwc3_gadget_init_endpoints(struct dwc3 *dwc)
+static int dwc3_gadget_init_hw_endpoints(struct dwc3 *dwc,
+               u32 num, u32 direction)

   Why not 'bool direction'?

  {
        struct dwc3_ep                  *dep;
-       u8                              epnum;
+       u8                              i;

   Why not 'u32 i' if the loop is for 'u32 num'?


-       INIT_LIST_HEAD(&dwc->gadget.ep_list);
+       for (i = 0; i < num; i++) {
+               int             epnum = (i << 1) | (!!direction);

   () around !!x are superfluous I think.

WBR, Sergei

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to