On Fri, 29 Mar 2013, Lan Tianyu wrote: > On 2013/3/29 0:50, Alan Stern wrote: > > On Fri, 29 Mar 2013, Lan Tianyu wrote: > > > >> About the path "usb: Add usb port system pm support", do you think it's > >> ok? > > > > Generally yes. But why doesn't usb_port_system_suspend check for any > > PM_QOS constraints? Either on the port itself or on the child device. > Because usb_port_runtime_suspend() will PM Qos flags. If add check in > usb_port_system_suspend(), PM Qos flags would be checked twice and > this seems redundant.
Yes, that's right -- I noticed this the first time I read the patch and then forgot it again. I don't see any other problems with that patch. Alan Stern -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
