On Thu, 2013-08-01 at 11:53 -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Thu, 1 Aug 2013, Oliver Neukum wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 2013-07-31 at 11:13 -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
> >
> > > More importantly, if we already know that the medium is not present or
> > > has been changed since it was last used, then there's no reason to call
> > > sd_sync_cache() at all.
> >
> > Like this?
>
> Yes, I like this a lot better, except I would put the test for
> !sdkp->media_present in sd_suspend_common() -- no need to print the
But your observation that it makes no sense while no medium is present
is valid whatever be the reason for wanting to flush.
> "Synchronizing SCSI Cache" message if you're not going to go through
> with it.
>
> What do the SCSI people think?
I don't know. I would like Andy to test before I ask.
Regards
Oliver
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
