Please always use Reply-To-All so that your messages get sent to the   
mailing list as well as to me.

On Fri, 30 Aug 2013, Jürgen Liebmann wrote:

> When the commit that causes the problem increases the time between the two 
> request,
> maybe that's just this is the cause of the problem?
> Can you decrease this time again?

You can try the patch below.  Apply it to the 74a6af256648 kernel; it 
will reverse the timing effect of that commit.

> I can't believe that this is a hardware problem, because all older kernels 
> performs fine and all newer not!

If it isn't a hardware problem, why does the camera work okay after you 
initialize it in a virtual machine?

Alan Stern



Index: 3.10/drivers/usb/host/ehci-q.c
===================================================================
--- 3.10.orig/drivers/usb/host/ehci-q.c
+++ 3.10/drivers/usb/host/ehci-q.c
@@ -1170,7 +1170,7 @@ static void single_unlink_async(struct e
        struct ehci_qh          *prev;
 
        /* Add to the end of the list of QHs waiting for the next IAAD */
-       qh->qh_state = QH_STATE_UNLINK_WAIT;
+       qh->qh_state = QH_STATE_UNLINK;
        if (ehci->async_unlink)
                ehci->async_unlink_last->unlink_next = qh;
        else

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to