On Sat, Oct 12, 2013 at 10:40:37AM -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Sat, 12 Oct 2013, Peter Chen wrote:
>
> > Add property for supporting runtime power management
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Peter Chen <peter.c...@freescale.com>
> > ---
> > .../devicetree/bindings/usb/ci13xxx-imx.txt | 2 ++
> > 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/ci13xxx-imx.txt
> > b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/ci13xxx-imx.txt
> > index b4b5b79..f666598 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/ci13xxx-imx.txt
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/ci13xxx-imx.txt
> > @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@ Optional properties:
> > - vbus-supply: regulator for vbus
> > - disable-over-current: disable over current detect
> > - external-vbus-divider: enables off-chip resistor divider for Vbus
> > +- supports_runtime_pm: enable runtime pm support
> >
> > Examples:
> > usb@02184000 { /* USB OTG */
> > @@ -28,4 +29,5 @@ usb@02184000 { /* USB OTG */
> > fsl,usbmisc = <&usbmisc 0>;
> > disable-over-current;
> > external-vbus-divider;
> > + supports_runtime_pm;
> > };
>
> This does not sound like a property of the hardware. What's the
> _hardware_ difference between parts that support runtime PM and parts
> that don't?
Thanks.
>From my point, all hardware using chipidea core should support runtime pm.
But some of platforms need special glue layer operations to support
it, it will break other platforms if enable chipidea core runtime pm.
Since device tree describes hardware property, maybe I should move
it to glue layer, or do you have any suggestions?
--
Best Regards,
Peter Chen
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
