On Thu, 31 Oct 2013, Valentine wrote: > > Do you mean to change usb_hcd_pci_probe() to return -EPROBE_DEFER if the > > phy is not ready? > > Or should I defer the whole PCI subsystem initialization (pci_common_int)? > > Greg, > the reason I ask is that it doesn't seem that simple to me. > > Here's some details: > The h/w is an ARM SoC that has 3 internal PCI controllers with a single > EHCI/OHCI on each one. > This gives us 3 USB channels as this is called in the h/w manual. > Channel 0 is shared with USBHS (USB function) device. > Channel 2 is shared with USBSS (USB3.0 host). > Both channels are configured by a single USB phy. > USB PHY is a platform device, while EHCI/OCHI are located on the PCI busses. > > If PCI USB host is probed before USB phy, the EHCI/OHCI device is > detected, but nothing works. > > We could change the USB HDC PCI driver and make usb_hcd_pci_probe() return > -EPROBE_DEFER, > but I'm not sure how the condition for that should be phrased.
You need to tell usb_hcd_pci_probe() to wait for the PHY. That seems to be the proper solution to your problem. The difficulty is that you have a discoverable device (the PCI EHCI controller) which needs to wait for a platform device (the PHY). The kernel doesn't have a good way to describe such a constraint between two different kinds of device like that, as far as I know. This is similar to the problems facing Runtime Interpreted Power Sequences, although not quite the same. Alan Stern -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
