On Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 09:20:07AM +0000, dt.ta...@gmail.com wrote:
> From: Daniel Tang <dt.ta...@gmail.com>
> 
> The SoC name was mistakenly used instead of the vendor name in the
> device tree binding for nspire-usb.
> 
> This patch fixes this before the driver becomes widely adopted.

How widely adopted is it so far?

I can't see the binding in mainline yet.

> 
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Tang <dt.ta...@gmail.com>
> ---
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/ci-hdrc-nspire.txt |    4 ++--
>  drivers/usb/chipidea/ci_hdrc_nspire.c                    |    2 +-
>  2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/ci-hdrc-nspire.txt 
> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/ci-hdrc-nspire.txt
> index 5ba8e90..ef1fcbf 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/ci-hdrc-nspire.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/ci-hdrc-nspire.txt
> @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
>  * TI-Nspire USB OTG Controller
>  
>  Required properties:
> -- compatible: Should be "zevio,nspire-usb"
> +- compatible: Should be "lsi,nspire-usb"

Surely this should be lsi,zevio-usb, matching the lsi,zevio-timer
binding?

Thanks,
Mark.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to