On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 04:26:55PM +0400, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
> Hello.
>
> On 29-01-2014 16:22, Simon Horman wrote:
>
> >>>>[snip]
>
> >>>>>>+static struct of_device_id rcar_gen2_usb_phy_ofmatch[] = {
> >>>>>>+ { .compatible = "renesas,usb-phy-r8a7790", },
> >>>>>>+ { .compatible = "renesas,rcar-gen2-usb-phy", },
>
> >>>>> Frankly speaking, I don't understand the need for the clearly
> >>>>>duplicate entries.
>
> >>>>Thanks, will look into remove it.
> >>>>Anyone else have any comments on this?
>
> >>>I would like you to leave it there.
>
> >>>As we know the r8a7790 is an R-Car Gen2 SoC. But there are other R-Car
> >>>Gen2 SoCs, such as the r8a7791, they it could plausibly make use of
> >>>rcar-gen2-usb-phy until the driver is updated with a usb-phy-r8a7791 entry.
>
> >> Why not just "update" the driver this way now, may I ask?
>
> >Because I don't believe that Ben has access to r8a7791 hardware
> >to test the change and thus it makes sense to handle it separately.
>
> I believe Valentine has already tested the driver with both SoCs.
Oh, great. Then I guess the compat string for r8a7791 can be added
as you suggest.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
