On Mon, Oct 06, 2014 at 09:59:48AM +0900, Yoshihiro Shimoda wrote:
> Hello.
> 
> (2014/10/04 4:50), Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
> > On 10/02/2014 12:04 PM, Yoshihiro Shimoda wrote:
> > 
> >> Signed-off-by: Yoshihiro Shimoda <yoshihiro.shimoda...@renesas.com>
> >> ---
> >>   arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7790-lager.dts |    5 +++++
> >>   1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
> > 
> >> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7790-lager.dts 
> >> b/arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7790-lager.dts
> >> index 1698591..4badd0a 100644
> >> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7790-lager.dts
> >> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7790-lager.dts
> >> @@ -445,3 +445,8 @@
> >>            };
> >>    };
> >>   };
> >> +
> >> +&hsusb {
> >> +  status = "okay";
> >> +  renesas,enable-gpio = <&gpio5 18 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
> > 
> >     It's certainly active-high.
> 
> Since the current code has the following, we have to set the active_low...
> However, the code is unreadable, I think. So, I will modify the code.

It seems to me that would be best.

As far as possible the bindings and their use should
describe the hardware rather than the software.

>       /* check GPIO determining if USB function should be enabled */
>       if (priv->dparam.enable_gpio) {
>               gpio_request_one(priv->dparam.enable_gpio, GPIOF_IN, NULL);
>               ret = !gpio_get_value(priv->dparam.enable_gpio);
>               gpio_free(priv->dparam.enable_gpio);
>               if (ret) {
>                       dev_warn(&pdev->dev,
>                                "USB function not selected (GPIO %d)\n",
>                                priv->dparam.enable_gpio);
>                       ret = -ENOTSUPP;
>                       goto probe_end_mod_exit;
>               }
>       }
> 
> Best regards,
> Yoshihiro Shimoda
> 
> > WBR, Sergei
> > 
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to