On Tuesday 04 November 2014 06:46 AM, Varka Bhadram wrote:
Hi greg k-h,

On Tuesday 04 November 2014 05:16 AM, Greg KH wrote:
On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 05:31:41PM +0300, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
Hello.

On 10/31/2014 4:14 AM, Varka Bhadram wrote:

This series removes the duplication of sanity check for
platform_get_resource() return resource. It will be checked
with devm_ioremap_resource()
This entire series rebased on testing/fixes of [1].
[1]: http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/balbi/usb.git

changes since v1:
    - removed broken patches
- added Ack of Alan Stern for all the ehci, ohci, and uhci changes.
changes since v2:
    - addressed Sergei Shtylyov comments
Varka Bhadram (29):
   host: ehci-atmel: remove duplicate check on resource
   host: ohci-da8xx: remove duplicate check on resource
   host: ehci-tegra: remove duplicate check on resource
   host: ehci-w90x900: remove duplicate check on resource
   host: ohci-at91: remove duplicate check on resource
   host: ohci-exynos: remove duplicate check on resource
   host: ohci-jz4740: remove duplicate check on resource
   host: ohci-octeon: remove duplicate check on resource
   host: ohci-platform: remove duplicate check on resource
   host: ohci-pxa27x: remove duplicate check on resource
   host: ehci-sh: remove duplicate check on resource
   host: ohci-spear: remove duplicate check on resource
   host: ehci-msm: remove duplicate check on resource
   host: ehci-mv: remove duplicate check on resource
   host: ehci-mxc: remove duplicate check on resource
   host: ehci-octeon: remove duplicate check on resource
   host: ehci-orion: remove duplicate check on resource
   host: ehci-platform: remove duplicate check on resource
   host: ehci-sead3: fix NULL pointer dereference on resource

Mixing fixes and cleanups in one series is not a good idea, generally
speaking.
I agree.  Send me the fixes "first" in a series, so that I can get them
into this kernel release, and older ones.  Then send the cleanups in a
separate series based on your first one, if needed, and all should be
good.

I will send the fixes based on [1] usb-next branch first, then cleanup as a separate series.

But balbi told that these series should go through his [2] kernel tree. Can i send this entire series
based on [1] usb-next branch..?


Thanks for the review.

[1]:http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/balbi/usb.git/
[2]:https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/gregkh/usb.git/

I divided the entire series into two series's, one for fixes and another for 
cleanup with version4.

I rebased the series on usb-next branch of [1] and send it.

Please review it.

[1]:https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/gregkh/usb.git/

--
Thanks and Regards,
Varka Bhadram.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to