Peter Chen <peter.c...@freescale.com> writes:
> @@ -348,23 +356,14 @@ static void usb_gadget_remove_driver(struct usb_udc
> *udc)
> */
> void usb_del_gadget_udc(struct usb_gadget *gadget)
> {
> - struct usb_udc *udc = NULL;
> -
> - mutex_lock(&udc_lock);
> - list_for_each_entry(udc, &udc_list, list)
> - if (udc->gadget == gadget)
> - goto found;
> -
> - dev_err(gadget->dev.parent, "gadget not registered.\n");
> - mutex_unlock(&udc_lock);
> + struct usb_udc *udc = usb_gadget_find_udc(gadget);
>
> - return;
> + if (!udc)
> + return;
>
> -found:
> dev_vdbg(gadget->dev.parent, "unregistering gadget\n");
>
> list_del(&udc->list);
> - mutex_unlock(&udc_lock);
I believe udc->list linkage to udc_list still should be protected with
udc_lock, otherwise this will race with usb_add_gadget_udc_release().
Regards,
--
Alex
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
