Hi Sylvain,
On Sat, 17 Jan 2015 23:49:00 +0100
Sylvain Rochet <sylvain.roc...@finsecur.com> wrote:
> Hi Sergei,
>
>
> On Sun, Jan 18, 2015 at 01:22:38AM +0300, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
> >
> > There's little inconsistency in your patch subjects: you're using
> > '_' but the files you're modifying are named using '-'...
>
> Indeed.
>
>
> > >@@ -187,6 +217,8 @@ static struct platform_driver ehci_atmel_driver = {
> > > .probe = ehci_atmel_drv_probe,
> > > .remove = ehci_atmel_drv_remove,
> > > .shutdown = usb_hcd_platform_shutdown,
> > >+ .suspend = ehci_atmel_drv_suspend,
> > >+ .resume = ehci_atmel_drv_resume,
> >
> > I think you should use 'struct dev_pm_ops' now.
>
> This way ?
>
> static int ehci_atmel_drv_suspend(struct device *dev)
> {
> struct usb_hcd *hcd = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> (...)
>
>
> static SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS(ehci_atmel_pm_ops, ehci_atmel_drv_suspend,
> ehci_atmel_drv_resume);
>
> (...)
> .driver = {
> .pm = &ehci_atmel_pm_ops,
> }
> (...)
>
>
> Should I send a v4 or can I send this change separately on top of the
> previous change ?
I think it's better to send a v4 reworking this patch (you'll have to
change your commit subject anyway ;-)).
Best Regards,
Boris
--
Boris Brezillon, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
