On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 01:49:51PM -0600, Bin Liu wrote: > On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 1:48 PM, Felipe Balbi <ba...@ti.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 01:30:21PM -0600, Bin Liu wrote: > >> Felipe, > >> > >> On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 12:27 PM, Felipe Balbi <ba...@ti.com> wrote: > >> > On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 12:25:16PM -0600, Felipe Balbi wrote: > >> >> FSDEV is set for both HIGH and FULL speeds, > >> >> the correct HIGHSPEED check is done through > >> >> power register's HSMODE bit. > >> >> > >> >> Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi <ba...@ti.com> > >> > > >> > I'm still unsure if we should really ignore babble on FS/LS. It seems to > >> > me we should never ignore it, but I really don't have a way to prove > >> > this statement. For the sake of reducing impact, we will just fix HS > >> > check here. > >> > > >> > >> I believe we should drop speed check in here and not ignore babble > >> regardless. We have seen many cases that full-speed babble causes MUSB > >> stop working. > > > > I'll make that as a separate patch then, just to make sure we can revert > > it later if something goes wrong ;-) > > Agreed.
I noticed something else. If we really don't need to reset musb in case of babble, then we can drop that recover_work completely which simplifies babble handling quite a bit. I'll fiddle with that, if you don't mind. -- balbi
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature