On 05/22/2015 11:11 AM, David Cohen wrote:
On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 08:09:54PM -0700, David Cohen wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 10:07:05AM +0800, Lu Baolu wrote:
Many drivers and modules depend on ULPI bus registeration to
register ULPI interfaces and drivers. It's more appropriate
to register ULPI bus in subsys_initcall instead of module_init.
Kernel panic has been reported with some kind of kernel config.
Even though I agree subsys_initcall is better to register ulpi bus, it's
still no excuse to have kernel panic. What about ULPI bus being compiled
as module?
No kernel panic if ULPI is built as a module.
IMHO this is avoiding the proper kernel panic fix which should be
failing gracefully (or defer probe) from tusb1210 driver.
Maybe I need to express myself better :)
IMHO we should not consider work done with this patch only. It's still
incomplete.
I am with you on that we should know the real problem.
I could go ahead with further debugging. Do you have any suggestions
about which direction should I go?
Br, David
Thank you,
-Baolu
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
