On Fri, 22 May 2015, Robert Schlabbach wrote:

> On Thu, 21 May 2015, Alan Stern wrote:
> 
> > I suspect you have not divided up all the actions in the correct way.  
> > Look at everything in hub_port_finish_reset and think carefully about
> > where each one belongs.
> 
> I had taken a very "conservative" approach to only minimally alter the
> behavior specifically for the fix I needed, since I understand too little
> of the code to know what I might break if I made bolder changes.
> 
> Now following "bold" approach, I went all the way and dissolved
> hub_port_finish_reset() completely, moving all of its actions over to
> hub_port_reset(). Moving the clearing of the port change bits over to
> hub_port_wait_reset() seemed impractical to me, since that has many
> return statements in it, and the clearing must be done in every case, so
> it's simpler to put this in hub_port_reset() after hub_port_wait_reset()
> has returned.
> 
> While at it, I also changed the error handling for the initial "double
> check" and removed an unneeded advance declaration of hub_port_reset().

Okay.

> The resulting unified (!:-)) diff patch versus 3.19.8 is:
> 
> 
> diff -u -r a/drivers/usb/core/hub.c b/drivers/usb/core/hub.c
> --- a/drivers/usb/core/hub.c  2015-05-21 00:11:25.000000000 +0200
> +++ b/drivers/usb/core/hub.c  2015-05-22 08:15:37.199743870 +0200
> @@ -2616,9 +2616,6 @@
>       return USE_NEW_SCHEME(retry);
>  }
>  
> -static int hub_port_reset(struct usb_hub *hub, int port1,
> -                     struct usb_device *udev, unsigned int delay, bool warm);
> -
>  /* Is a USB 3.0 port in the Inactive or Compliance Mode state?
>   * Port worm reset is required to recover
>   */
> @@ -2706,44 +2703,6 @@
>       return 0;
>  }
>  
> -static void hub_port_finish_reset(struct usb_hub *hub, int port1,
> -                     struct usb_device *udev, int *status)
> -{
> -     switch (*status) {
> -     case 0:
> -             /* TRSTRCY = 10 ms; plus some extra */
> -             msleep(10 + 40);
> -             if (udev) {
> -                     struct usb_hcd *hcd = bus_to_hcd(udev->bus);
> -
> -                     update_devnum(udev, 0);
> -                     /* The xHC may think the device is already reset,
> -                      * so ignore the status.
> -                      */
> -                     if (hcd->driver->reset_device)
> -                             hcd->driver->reset_device(hcd, udev);
> -             }
> -             /* FALL THROUGH */
> -     case -ENOTCONN:
> -     case -ENODEV:
> -             usb_clear_port_feature(hub->hdev,
> -                             port1, USB_PORT_FEAT_C_RESET);
> -             if (hub_is_superspeed(hub->hdev)) {
> -                     usb_clear_port_feature(hub->hdev, port1,
> -                                     USB_PORT_FEAT_C_BH_PORT_RESET);
> -                     usb_clear_port_feature(hub->hdev, port1,
> -                                     USB_PORT_FEAT_C_PORT_LINK_STATE);
> -                     usb_clear_port_feature(hub->hdev, port1,
> -                                     USB_PORT_FEAT_C_CONNECTION);
> -             }
> -             if (udev)
> -                     usb_set_device_state(udev, *status
> -                                     ? USB_STATE_NOTATTACHED
> -                                     : USB_STATE_DEFAULT);
> -             break;
> -     }
> -}
> -
>  /* Handle port reset and port warm(BH) reset (for USB3 protocol ports) */
>  static int hub_port_reset(struct usb_hub *hub, int port1,
>                       struct usb_device *udev, unsigned int delay, bool warm)
> @@ -2767,17 +2726,15 @@
>                * If the caller hasn't explicitly requested a warm reset,
>                * double check and see if one is needed.
>                */
> -             status = hub_port_status(hub, port1,
> -                                     &portstatus, &portchange);
> -             if (status < 0)
> -                     goto done;

So you removed this goto.  Fair enough; it's probably not useful.

> -
> -             if (hub_port_warm_reset_required(hub, port1, portstatus))
> -                     warm = true;
> +             if (hub_port_status(hub, port1, &portstatus, &portchange) == 0) 
> {
> +                     if (hub_port_warm_reset_required(hub, port1, 
> portstatus))
> +                             warm = true;
> +             }
>       }
>       clear_bit(port1, hub->warm_reset_bits);
>  
>       /* Reset the port */
> +     status = 0;

I don't think this line is necessary, because status gets overwritten
two lines below.

>       for (i = 0; i < PORT_RESET_TRIES; i++) {
>               status = set_port_feature(hub->hdev, port1, (warm ?
>                                       USB_PORT_FEAT_BH_PORT_RESET :
> @@ -2795,11 +2752,22 @@
>                               dev_dbg(hub->intfdev,
>                                               "port_wait_reset: err = %d\n",
>                                               status);
> +
> +                     /* clear wPortChange bits which may have been set */
> +                     usb_clear_port_feature(hub->hdev,
> +                                     port1, USB_PORT_FEAT_C_RESET);
> +                     if (hub_is_superspeed(hub->hdev)) {
> +                             usb_clear_port_feature(hub->hdev, port1,
> +                                             USB_PORT_FEAT_C_BH_PORT_RESET);
> +                             usb_clear_port_feature(hub->hdev, port1,
> +                                             
> USB_PORT_FEAT_C_PORT_LINK_STATE);
> +                             usb_clear_port_feature(hub->hdev, port1,
> +                                             USB_PORT_FEAT_C_CONNECTION);
> +                     }

Strictly speaking, these lines should be executed only if status is 0 
or -ENOTCONN or -ENODEV.  Which means this new material belongs inside 
an "else {}" block for the preceding "if" statement.

>               }
>  
>               /* Check for disconnect or reset */
>               if (status == 0 || status == -ENOTCONN || status == -ENODEV) {
> -                     hub_port_finish_reset(hub, port1, udev, &status);
>  
>                       if (!hub_is_superspeed(hub->hdev))
>                               goto done;
> @@ -2836,6 +2804,26 @@
>       dev_err(&port_dev->dev, "Cannot enable. Maybe the USB cable is bad?\n");
>  
>  done:
> +     if (status == 0) {
> +             /* TRSTRCY = 10 ms; plus some extra */
> +             msleep(10 + 40);
> +             if (udev) {
> +                     struct usb_hcd *hcd = bus_to_hcd(udev->bus);
> +
> +                     update_devnum(udev, 0);
> +                     /* The xHC may think the device is already reset,
> +                      * so ignore the status.
> +                      */
> +                     if (hcd->driver->reset_device)
> +                             hcd->driver->reset_device(hcd, udev);
> +
> +                     usb_set_device_state(udev, USB_STATE_DEFAULT);
> +             }
> +     } else {
> +             if (udev)
> +                     usb_set_device_state(udev, USB_STATE_NOTATTACHED);
> +     }
> +
>       if (!hub_is_superspeed(hub->hdev))
>               up_read(&ehci_cf_port_reset_rwsem);
> 
> 
> What do you think of this? It also fixes my problem.

This looks a lot better.  Remember to run your changes through 
scripts/checkpatch.pl, and follow the instructions in 
Documentation/SubmittingPatches when you submit it.

Alan Stern

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to