On Tue, 23 Jun 2015, Ruslan Bilovol wrote: > Change behavior during registration of gadgets and > gadget drivers in udc-core. Instead of previous > approach when for successful probe of usb gadget driver > at least one usb gadget should be already registered > use another one where gadget drivers and gadgets > can be registered in udc-core independently. > > Independent registration of gadgets and gadget drivers > is useful for built-in into kernel gadget and gadget > driver case - because it's possible that gadget is > really probed only on late_init stage (due to deferred > probe) whereas gadget driver's probe is silently failed > on module_init stage due to no any UDC added. > > Also it is useful for modules case - now there is no > difference what module to insert first: gadget module > or gadget driver one. > > Tested-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.rip...@free-electrons.com> > Signed-off-by: Ruslan Bilovol <ruslan.bilo...@gmail.com>
> @@ -484,6 +507,16 @@ int usb_gadget_unregister_driver(struct > usb_gadget_driver *driver) > break; > } > > + if (ret) { > + struct usb_gadget_driver *tmp; > + > + list_for_each_entry(tmp, &gadget_driver_pending_list, pending) > + if (tmp == driver) { > + list_del(&driver->pending); > + ret = 0; > + break; > + } > + } Weren't you going to replace this loop with a simple list_del()? IIRC, this is the third time I have asked you to make this change. Alan Stern -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html