On Tue, 23 Jun 2015, Ruslan Bilovol wrote:
> Change behavior during registration of gadgets and
> gadget drivers in udc-core. Instead of previous
> approach when for successful probe of usb gadget driver
> at least one usb gadget should be already registered
> use another one where gadget drivers and gadgets
> can be registered in udc-core independently.
>
> Independent registration of gadgets and gadget drivers
> is useful for built-in into kernel gadget and gadget
> driver case - because it's possible that gadget is
> really probed only on late_init stage (due to deferred
> probe) whereas gadget driver's probe is silently failed
> on module_init stage due to no any UDC added.
>
> Also it is useful for modules case - now there is no
> difference what module to insert first: gadget module
> or gadget driver one.
>
> Tested-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.rip...@free-electrons.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ruslan Bilovol <ruslan.bilo...@gmail.com>
> @@ -484,6 +507,16 @@ int usb_gadget_unregister_driver(struct
> usb_gadget_driver *driver)
> break;
> }
>
> + if (ret) {
> + struct usb_gadget_driver *tmp;
> +
> + list_for_each_entry(tmp, &gadget_driver_pending_list, pending)
> + if (tmp == driver) {
> + list_del(&driver->pending);
> + ret = 0;
> + break;
> + }
> + }
Weren't you going to replace this loop with a simple list_del()? IIRC,
this is the third time I have asked you to make this change.
Alan Stern
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
