Hi,

Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kis...@ti.com> writes:
>>>> On Thursday 04 February 2016 05:48 PM, Felipe Balbi wrote:
>>>>> That FIFO resizing logic was added to support OMAP5
>>>>> ES1.0 which had a bogus default FIFO size. I can't
>>>>> remember the exact size of default FIFO, but it was
>>>>> less than one bulk superspeed packet (<1024) which
>>>>> would prevent USB3 from ever working on OMAP5 ES1.0.
>>>>>
>>>>> However, OMAP5 ES1.0 support has been dropped by
>>>>> commit aa2f4b16f830 ("ARM: OMAP5: id: Remove ES1.0
>>>>> support") which renders FIFO resizing unnecessary.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi <ba...@kernel.org>
>>>>
>>>> tested this series on both dra7-evm and dra72-evm using mass storage 
>>>> gadget and
>>>> msc.sh
>>>
>>> both HS and SS ?
>> 
>> yes.. but the logs here were for only SS.
>>>
>>>> dra72-evm: http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/14887997/
>>>> dra7-evm: http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/14887975/
>>>>
>>>> Tested-by: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kis...@ti.com>
>>>>
>>>> Let me know if you want me to do any other testing on dra7.
>>>
>>> yeah, run testusb for a week or so, that usually catches odd bugs.
>> 
>> Okay. I'll start the test before I go for vacation next week.
>
> Looks like the test couldn't complete and I see dumps [1] in my host
> PC. Here's the output of testusb [2].
>
> [1] -> http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/15169114/
> [2] -> http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/15169116/

Does this also happen without this patch applied ?

-- 
balbi

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to