On Mon, 2016-07-18 at 15:23 +0200, Kristian Evensen wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 3:01 PM, Oliver Neukum <oneu...@suse.com> wrote: > > On Mon, 2016-07-18 at 14:24 +0200, Kristian Evensen wrote: > >> The firmware in the ZTE MF823/831/910 modems/mifis use OS fingerprinting to > >> determine which type of device to export. In addition, these devices export > >> a REST API which can also be used to control the type of device. So far, on > >> Linux, the devices have been seen as RNDIS or CDC Ether. > >> > >> When CDC Ether is used, devices of the same type are, as with RNDIS, > >> exported with the same, bogus random MAC address. In addition, the devices > > > > Please explain. If the MAC is random, I fail to see why the host would > > be any better at making up a MAC. > > Sorry for not explaining this properly. The problem is that all > devices of the same type store the same value in iMACAddress. On all > MF831/MF910s (that I have seen) 36:4b:50:b7:ef:da is stored in this > value, while 36:4b:50:b7:ef:38 is stored on MF823. In order to ensure > that all devices on a host has a unique MAC-address, I think it is > better to generate a new random MAC on the host than to trust the > value returned from the device.
OK, thanks for explaining. > >> * If a random MAC is read from device, then generate a new random MAC > >> address. This fix will apply to all devices using cdc_ether, but that > >> should be ok as we will also fix similar mistakes from other > >> manufacturers. > > > > I am not really happy with this. > > > > If this is specific to the device a quirk should be used. If it is a > > truly generic misdesign, it does not belong into cdc-ether. It should go > > into the generic layer. > > We saw the same behaviour when these devices are exposed as RNDIS and > decided to apply a generic fix instead of limiting ourself to for > example the two, known bogus MAC address. See commit > a5a18bdf7453d505783e40e47ebb84bfdd35f93b and the thread "[PATCH] > rndis_host: Set random MAC for ZTE MF910" > (http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-usb/msg143727.html) for the > discussion. > > However, I have no strong objections towards for example checking > against the two bad MAC addresses before generating a random MAC. No, you misunderstand me. I don't want quirks if we can avoid it. But if you need to do this for rndis_host and cdc_ether and maybe other drivers you should not be touching drivers. This belongs into the core ethernet code. Your code is good, but you are putting it in the wrong places. Regards Oliver -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
