Hi,
On 31-07-16 13:25, Icenowy Zheng wrote:
There's something unknown in the pmu part.
Signed-off-by: Icenowy Zheng <icen...@aosc.xyz>
Cool, I really like the work you're doing on A64 support,
keep up the good work!
---
drivers/phy/phy-sun4i-usb.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/phy/phy-sun4i-usb.c b/drivers/phy/phy-sun4i-usb.c
index 0a45bc6..6f94369 100644
--- a/drivers/phy/phy-sun4i-usb.c
+++ b/drivers/phy/phy-sun4i-usb.c
@@ -97,6 +97,7 @@ enum sun4i_usb_phy_type {
sun6i_a31_phy,
sun8i_a33_phy,
sun8i_h3_phy,
+ sun50i_a64_phy,
};
struct sun4i_usb_phy_cfg {
@@ -180,8 +181,9 @@ static void sun4i_usb_phy_write(struct sun4i_usb_phy *phy,
u32 addr, u32 data,
mutex_lock(&phy_data->mutex);
- if (phy_data->cfg->type == sun8i_a33_phy) {
- /* A33 needs us to set phyctl to 0 explicitly */
+ if (phy_data->cfg->type == sun8i_a33_phy ||
+ phy_data->cfg->type == sun50i_a64_phy) {
+ /* A33 or A64 needs us to set phyctl to 0 explicitly */
writel(0, phyctl);
}
Maybe add a "bool explicitly_0_phyctl;" to sun4i_usb_phy_cfg ?
Note I'm not sure of this myself, feel free to keep this as is,
we can always introduce such a bool when we get a 3th SoC which
needs it.
@@ -264,6 +266,12 @@ static int sun4i_usb_phy_init(struct phy *_phy)
val = readl(phy->pmu + REG_PMU_UNK_H3);
writel(val & ~2, phy->pmu + REG_PMU_UNK_H3);
} else {
+ /* A64 needs also this unknown bit */
+ if (data->cfg->type == sun50i_a64_phy) {
+ val = readl(phy->pmu + REG_PMU_UNK_H3);
+ writel(val & ~2, phy->pmu + REG_PMU_UNK_H3);
+ }
+
/* Enable USB 45 Ohm resistor calibration */
if (phy->index == 0)
sun4i_usb_phy_write(phy, PHY_RES45_CAL_EN, 0x01, 1);
Erm, as pointed out thus duplicates code from the H3 code path, I believe
that you should add a "bool needs_h3_pmu_unk_poke;" to sun4i_usb_phy_cfg
and then change this bit of the code to:
if (data->cfg->needs_h3_pmu_unk_poke) {
val = readl(phy->pmu + REG_PMU_UNK_H3);
writel(val & ~2, phy->pmu + REG_PMU_UNK_H3);
}
if (data->cfg->type == sun8i_h3_phy) {
if (phy->index == 0) {
val = readl(data->base + REG_PHY_UNK_H3);
writel(val & ~1, data->base + REG_PHY_UNK_H3);
}
} else {
... (original code)
}
That seems like a cleaner solution to me.
And do not forget to set the needs_h3_pmu_unk_poke for the h3!
I would not add it to the sun4i_usb_phy_cfg structs for the
other type SoCs, if part of the struct is initialized the
rest will get set to 0 by the compiler and I believe that
it things will be more readable without an explicit:
.needs_h3_pmu_unk_poke = false
Everywhere.
Thanks & Regards,
Hans
@@ -762,6 +770,14 @@ static const struct sun4i_usb_phy_cfg sun8i_h3_cfg = {
.dedicated_clocks = true,
};
+static const struct sun4i_usb_phy_cfg sun50i_a64_cfg = {
+ .num_phys = 2,
+ .type = sun50i_a64_phy,
+ .disc_thresh = 3,
+ .phyctl_offset = REG_PHYCTL_A33,
+ .dedicated_clocks = true,
+};
+
static const struct of_device_id sun4i_usb_phy_of_match[] = {
{ .compatible = "allwinner,sun4i-a10-usb-phy", .data = &sun4i_a10_cfg },
{ .compatible = "allwinner,sun5i-a13-usb-phy", .data = &sun5i_a13_cfg },
@@ -770,6 +786,7 @@ static const struct of_device_id sun4i_usb_phy_of_match[] =
{
{ .compatible = "allwinner,sun8i-a23-usb-phy", .data = &sun8i_a23_cfg },
{ .compatible = "allwinner,sun8i-a33-usb-phy", .data = &sun8i_a33_cfg },
{ .compatible = "allwinner,sun8i-h3-usb-phy", .data = &sun8i_h3_cfg },
+ { .compatible = "allwinner,sun50i-a64-usb-phy", .data =
&sun50i_a64_cfg},
{ },
};
MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, sun4i_usb_phy_of_match);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
