Baole Ni <baolex...@intel.com> writes:

> I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value
> when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission.
> As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the 
> corresponding macro,
> and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability of the code,
> thus, I suggest replacing the numeric parameter with the macro.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chuansheng Liu <chuansheng....@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Baole Ni <baolex...@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/usb/phy/phy-twl6030-usb.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/phy/phy-twl6030-usb.c 
> b/drivers/usb/phy/phy-twl6030-usb.c
> index a72e8d6..4ed75c6 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/phy/phy-twl6030-usb.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/phy/phy-twl6030-usb.c
> @@ -208,7 +208,7 @@ static ssize_t twl6030_usb_vbus_show(struct device *dev,
>  
>       return ret;
>  }
> -static DEVICE_ATTR(vbus, 0444, twl6030_usb_vbus_show, NULL);
> +static DEVICE_ATTR(vbus, S_IRUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH, twl6030_usb_vbus_show, 
> NULL);

line too long

-- 
balbi

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to