Hello, At v7, userspace transmission and WebSocket command/daemon have been removed from this series because I accepted comments that it can be done by userspace proxy.
Best Regards, n.iwata // > -----Original Message----- > From: Bjørn Mork [mailto:bj...@mork.no] > Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2016 3:30 AM > To: Krzysztof Opasiak > Cc: fx IWATA NOBUO; valentina.mane...@gmail.com; shuah...@samsung.com; > gre...@linuxfoundation.org; linux-usb@vger.kernel.org; fx MICHIMURA > TADAO > Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 0/9] usbip: exporting devices > > Krzysztof Opasiak <k.opas...@samsung.com> writes: > > > As far as I can see, our main use case is to bypass the firewall but I > > don't understand why you don't want to solve this problem simply in > > userspace? > > That was my immediate reaction, too. So I tried asking about it in January > and got this explanation: > > > | > You can implement a TCP<->websocket proxy in userspace on each side > | > | Yes. > | But assuming small device (like raspberry Pi) with WebCam isochronous > | transfer, this patch helps to get smoother motion. > | I think it's not bad to put small hooks to usbip-host.ko and vhci-hcd.ko > | , introduce a separate module for userspace transfer if it clears > | errors pointed out below. > > ref > https://www.mail-archive.com/linux-usb@vger.kernel.org/msg69028.html > > I wasn't really too happy about that answer, but didn't have much more too > add. After all, it's not my business to decide whether that's a valid reason > or not. Luckily :) > > > Bjørn
