Dynamic debugging will already add the function (and the line number)
to a debug message if one requests that. It makes no sense to add
them unconditionally in a driver.

Signed-off-by: Oliver Neukum <oneu...@suse.com>
---
 drivers/usb/class/cdc-wdm.c | 7 +++----
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/usb/class/cdc-wdm.c b/drivers/usb/class/cdc-wdm.c
index 56d3ab8..bf4bb58 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/class/cdc-wdm.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/class/cdc-wdm.c
@@ -314,8 +314,7 @@ static void wdm_int_callback(struct urb *urb)
                && !test_bit(WDM_DISCONNECTING, &desc->flags)
                && !test_bit(WDM_SUSPENDING, &desc->flags)) {
                rv = usb_submit_urb(desc->response, GFP_ATOMIC);
-               dev_dbg(&desc->intf->dev, "%s: usb_submit_urb %d",
-                       __func__, rv);
+               dev_dbg(&desc->intf->dev, "submit response URB %d", rv);
        }
        spin_unlock(&desc->iuspin);
        if (rv < 0) {
@@ -574,7 +573,7 @@ retry:
                }
 
                if (!desc->reslength) { /* zero length read */
-                       dev_dbg(&desc->intf->dev, "%s: zero length - clearing 
WDM_READ\n", __func__);
+                       dev_dbg(&desc->intf->dev, "zero length - clearing 
WDM_READ");
                        clear_bit(WDM_READ, &desc->flags);
                        rv = service_outstanding_interrupt(desc);
                        spin_unlock_irq(&desc->iuspin);
@@ -1081,7 +1080,7 @@ static void wdm_disconnect(struct usb_interface *intf)
        if (!desc->count)
                cleanup(desc);
        else
-               dev_dbg(&intf->dev, "%s: %d open files - postponing cleanup\n", 
__func__, desc->count);
+               dev_dbg(&intf->dev, "%d open files - postponing cleanup\n", 
desc->count);
        mutex_unlock(&wdm_mutex);
 }
 
-- 
2.1.4

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to