On 12/02/2016 08:05 AM, fx IWATA NOBUO wrote: > Hello, > >> In my humble opinion connect is not a best name for this operation. > > Yes. I think connect is not perfect. > >> it not only starts the connection to a remote server but also> exports >> a device. I think that a name like export or attach_to_remote would be >> more suitable. (...) > > I think one word name is better. > > Considering that attach is corresponding to import request, I think > export is not good. Furthermore, export is already used in many places > of the code, ex. usbip_host_common.c: usbip_export_device(). So I don't > want to use export. > > Operation | PDU | Description > ----------+---------+----------------- > attach |import |invite a device > detach |NA |quit invited > ( ) |export |dedicate a device > ( ) |un-export|quit dedicated > > I think connect/disconnect is not bad. > I will change it if there's user friendly, well-known and suit with > existing name. >
Ehh, as usually the non technical problems are the toughest one;) I would be happy to suggest you a good name for this but I also cannot figure out any;) connect was not perfect from my point of view as it suggest that we are only establishing a tcp connection not connecting particular device but maybe it's only mine problem and misunderstanding;) Best regards, -- Krzysztof Opasiak Samsung R&D Institute Poland Samsung Electronics -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html