Andy Lutomirski <l...@amacapital.net> wrote: > > - sg_set_buf(&sg_out[1], pad, sizeof pad); > > + sg_set_buf(&sg_out[1], empty_zero_page, 16); > > My fix here is obviously bogus (I meant to use ZERO_PAGE(0)), but what > exactly is the code trying to do? The old code makes no sense. It's > setting the *output* buffer to zeroed padding.
Padding goes into the encrypt function and is going to come out of the decrypt function. Possibly derived_key_decrypt() should be checking that the padding that comes out is actually a bunch of zeros. Maybe we don't actually need to get the padding out, but I'm not sure whether the crypto layer will malfunction if we don't give it a buffer for the padding. David -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
