Hi, Lu Baolu <baolu...@linux.intel.com> writes: > On 12/26/2016 04:01 PM, Baolin Wang wrote: >> On some platfroms(like x86 platform), when one core is running the USB gadget >> irq thread handler by dwc3_thread_interrupt(), meanwhile another core also >> can >> respond other interrupts from dwc3 controller and modify the event buffer by >> dwc3_interrupt() function, that will cause getting the wrong event count in >> irq thread handler to make the USB function abnormal. >> >> We should add spin_lock/unlock() in dwc3_check_event_buf() to avoid this >> race. > > Why not spin_lock_irq ones? This lock seems to be used in both > normal and interrupt threads. Or, I missed anything?
this is top half handler. Interrupts are already disabled. -- balbi
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
