On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 12:20:03PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 12:59:33PM +0200, Felipe Balbi wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > Petr Cvek <petr.c...@tul.cz> writes: > > > It seems the USB product ID for g_webcam usb device gadget is > > > incorrectly used from EEM gadget "Ethernet Emulation Model". So > > > "webcam" device has a confusing description in lsusb: > > > > > > 1d6b:0102 Linux Foundation EEM Gadget > > > > > > I would change it to 0x0106, which is a next unassigned value > > > (according to http://www.linux-usb.org/usb.ids). Does this step > > > require some official communication with the holder of VID (Linux > > > Foundation)? Or all it takes is just to send patch to the kernel and > > > to the usb.ids database? > > > > > > I know it is only a cosmetic change on a legacy driver, but I assume > > > it would be better to have some default value for configfs API than to > > > borrow a PID from a whole different gadget. > > > > > > Change in question would be something like this (I will send a proper > > > patch after RFC): > > > > > > Fixing USB Product ID for UVC gadget (used from Ethernet Emulation > > > Model) and changing it to new one. > > > > Greg, do we still have an official Vendor ID? > > Well, as official as we are allowed to get :) > > > If so, any chance we can > > allocate a unique default ID for the webcam gadget? > > Hm, I thought we wanted to get rid of the "legacy" gadget stuff. Who is > using it these days? It's not Android... > > If it's really needed, then yes, you can use 0106, just let me know. > But do you really need a new id? What's wrong with 0102?
Oops, no, 0106 is already reserved. 0107 is the next "free" number. thanks, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
