> That would cut it, but TIOCPKT is too coupled with having a linked tty. > I could make acm behave like a pty (accept TIOCPKT and issue the > ctrl_status bits), but for that I need n_tty to know that packet does > not always mean a linked tty is present, and that in case it isn't we > take our own ctrl_status bits instead of the link's. I could write a > small (inline?) function to fetch the correct ctrl_status bits and put > that in n_tty. Does that make sense?
I think that makes sense, and I would do the job properly rather than do a hack with tty->link. Those hacks in the long term never work out the best approach. Alan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
