Not wanting to go over old ground here Jason, but IIRC you wanted more talks on gui type software, which quickly degenerated into a CLI/GUI flamewar oops I mean discussion.
I think someone may have suggested that you organise or conduct talks on the areas that interested you, if that has resulted in you "voting with your feet" then i think thats a shame. Maybe I have it wrong and there were some other issues i wasn't aware of. I hope you'll take part some more Jason, particularly as there is another installfest coming up. You have made a good contribution to the "group" and I hope it can continue. Nick On Thu, 30 Jan 2003 16:33:22 +1300 Jason Greenwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I will not bore the list as I am reasonably sure I have made it quite > clear what I would like the CLUG to do differently. IMHO, these concerns > have fallen on more than deaf ears, they have fallen on vehemently > contrary ears. That is totally fine, I guess I was outnumbered. As I > said, I am not trying to change the CLUG anymore, I chose to vote with > my feet instead. I still wish the CLUG the very best but it doesn't meet > my needs. I have therefore limited my involvement to the occasional > participation on list. > > Nick Rout wrote: > > >If you were the committee of one, what would you change? > > > > > >On Thu, 30 Jan 2003 16:01:35 +1300 > >Jason Greenwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > >>One problem with your little hypothesis/statement. It leaves no room for > >>change/progression/evolution. All things change in time, that is the way > >>of life. > >> > >>Jason Greenwood > >> > >> > > > > > >
