Hi Guy, If the goods supplied as a copy of an original brand RHXX (TM) is the same as the content of their own public release they have no grounds to object.
As long as the trademark is acknowleged ie BrandName (TM). If the content is different this would need to be acknowledged/stated by the distributor/seller. Product authenticity can also be maintained by their own Boxed product retail releases? If a product purported to be the same as RHXX (TM) public distribution is proven to differ without an acknowledgement of this difference by the distributor/seller then they would have a case (which they must prove). > > As any one in business knows the more exposure your product > > recieves the better for your business: > > If as a business you seek to limit that brand exposure you would > > only do this to maintain or increase profits: > > The problems is, Redhat have absolutely no control over what it is that is > getting exposure under their brand name. > > Guy Steven Regards Michael
