Nobody doubts this, least of all SCO. Which is why they haven't, to date, actually said _what_ the offending code is. Just that there is some. Somewhere. Apparently. ;-)
On Tuesday 19 August 2003 17:18, Chris Wilkinson wrote: > Hi there, > > Jason wrote: > > Ok Nick, you wanted your reason for inititating legal action - here it > > is (I think): > > I think the answer for Linux is to remove the code, add a different code > that accomplishes the same thing, and give the big fat finger to SCO... > > Kind regards, > > Chris Wilkinson, Christchurch.
