On Tuesday 23 December 2003 11:59, Nick Rout wrote: > errr the difference could be (and i picked this up off the ipcop-dev > mailing list0 that the ipcop folks may use strip to get rid of a whole > lot of stuff in the binary. > > using strip on the binary i created reduces it to 57056 bytes
ah, a very plausable explanation... > > I am emailing you the source i used offlist. Cheers for that. I found: http://www.gusnet.cx:8080/gus/proj/ez-ipupdate/ and; http://www.ez-ipupdate.org linked from the freshmeat ez-ipupdate page. I'm fairly satisfied that this is the official site for the ez-ipupdate project. There is a file: ez-ipupdate-3.0.11b8.tar.gz linked from that site. The filename, size, and md5 matches the tarball you emailed me. That's good enough for me :) Cheers, Gareth