Personally I do not think this is a true representation of the situation. A projector will cost around $3000 minimum of a suitable size / light output. The computer will cost maybe second hand $500. Powerpoint costs a few hundred dollars. The cost of powerpoint in those scenarios is but a small part of the overall cost. And the reason we use powerpoint is because everyone uses it. There's no scope for using some other incompatible system that won't be able to read powerpoint files. You don't need XP to run Powerpoint. Windows 98 is perfectly satisfactory. And you don't need to buy a whole Office package.Just thinking out loud here, but there's a big opportunity for the open source community within churches.
Many churches use Powerpoint and a data projecter to project song lyrics for the congregation. And those who don't already, want to.
Small churches often have a desire to grow, but a very small budget. They dream big dreams but can't afford to buy them. Morally, they can't use pirated software, and $$wise, they can't afford WinXP, and MS Office.
I'm not sticking my hand up, just having an idea, but if someone invited local churches to an installfest with the goal of getting a working "Powerpoint" machine operating for "free"...
Steve Bell wrote:
- Church Website... Don Gould
- RE: Church Website... Fisher, Robert (FXNZ CHC)
- Church opensource. Steve Bell
- Re: Church opensource. Michael Pearce
- RE: Church opensource. Don Gould
- RE: Church opensource. Patrick Dunford
- RE: Church opensource. Don Gould
- RE: "Everyone" u... Jim Cheetham
- Re: Church opensource. Nick Rout
- Re: Church opensource. Patrick Dunford
- Re: Church opensource. Nick Rout
- Re: Church opensou... Patrick Dunford
- Re: Church opensou... Nick Rout
- Re: Church opensou... Patrick Dunford
- Re: Church opensou... Jim Cheetham
- Re: Church opensou... anton