fui your headers

Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mta6-rme.xtra.co.nz ([210.86.15.143])
          by mta201-rme.xtra.co.nz with ESMTP
          id
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
          Fri, 19 Nov 2004 13:22:03 +1300
Received: from cantvc.canterbury.ac.nz ([132.181.2.36])
          by mta6-rme.xtra.co.nz with ESMTP
          id
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
          Fri, 19 Nov 2004 13:22:03 +1300
Received: from PROCESS-DAEMON.it.canterbury.ac.nz by it.canterbury.ac.nz
 (PMDF V6.2-X27 #30791) id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
 (original mail from [EMAIL PROTECTED]); Fri,
 19 Nov 2004 13:22:02 +1300 (NEW ZEALAND DAYLIGHT TIME)
Received: from PMAS-DAEMON.it.canterbury.ac.nz by it.canterbury.ac.nz
 (PMDF V6.2-X27 #30791) id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 (ORCPT [EMAIL PROTECTED]); Fri,
 19 Nov 2004 13:21:57 +1300 (NEW ZEALAND DAYLIGHT TIME)
Received: from CONVERSION-DAEMON.it.canterbury.ac.nz by it.canterbury.ac.nz
 (PMDF V6.2-X27 #30791) id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 (ORCPT [EMAIL PROTECTED]); Fri,
 19 Nov 2004 13:21:57 +1300 (NEW ZEALAND DAYLIGHT TIME)
Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.204])
 by it.canterbury.ac.nz (PMDF V6.2-X27 #30791)
 with ESMTP id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 (ORCPT [EMAIL PROTECTED]); Fri,
 19 Nov 2004 13:21:56 +1200 (NEW ZEALAND STANDARD TIME)
Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 69so22351wri for
 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 18 Nov 2004 16:21:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.54.53.30 with SMTP id b30mr113702wra; Thu,
 18 Nov 2004 16:21:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.54.46.16 with HTTP; Thu, 18 Nov 2004 16:21:55 -0800 (PST)
Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2004 13:21:55 +1300
From: Matthew Gregan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Did you guys know that gmail is fetchable with pop?
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Resent-reply-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-to:
Message-id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com;
 h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:mime-version:content-ty
pe:content-transfer-encoding;
 b=Z4fhyGsb73ecYl0V+wwiKoNfYpwB0zKlJsALjJ20TtPGHZnoe0uPpwCxHaj+5FYMDu9goRjj2
Wwcr34Bu95YcdUHg2Lzu5Zm82HCLPeviiiVxGhjO3fBgBblbDzQDknk8c0J3M/hZpCaw0hRneMQq
lx3MBsZ7YmcTdB8K0WjC4M=
X-PMAS-Software: PreciseMail V2.0-1 [041116] (cantva.canterbury.ac.nz)
X-PMAS-Allowed: Message allowed by user rule
Comments: University of Canterbury Linux Users Group
List-Subscribe:
 <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Unsubscribe:
 <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>


-----Original Message-----
From: Matthew Gregan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, 19 November 2004 1:22 p.m.
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Did you guys know that gmail is fetchable with pop?


At 2004-11-19T12:48:08+1300, Christopher Sawtell wrote:

> Has it still got the Reply-To: sillyness?

There's still no way to explicitly disable the addition of a Reply-To:
header from messages originating from Gmail.

This message will have an empty Reply-To: (which is almost definitely
not RFC 2822 compliant), and I'm curious about whether if the list
software will munge it.

Cheers,
-mjg


Reply via email to