On Wed, 09 Feb 2005 15:00:38 +1300 Roy Britten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What I'd like to do is rewrite the Return-Path header. Its current value (when > composing within Mutt) complies with the RFC and is an address that is only > reachable from within our WAN ([EMAIL PROTECTED]). is there a reason to _not_ set up mutt differently? -- Nick Rout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
