On 23/11/05, Derek Smithies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > Now, I do not follow what/where this thread is going. > > The orignal post described how the kernel had got much larger.
No it didn't. It said *compiling* the kernel took up more room. The size of the resulting compiled code was not the issue. The size of the disk space required while compiling the kernel was the issue. Clear as, right? Cheers, Carl.
