On 10/05/06, Carl Cerecke wrote:
PS might be OK in its narrow domain, but outside that it's not really suitable as a general purpose language.
Who said anything about general purpose? My original comment was: "What a perfect language for my needs." I didn't elaborate in those needs at the time, and I won't right now, suffice to say that it _is_ well within the narrow domain for which PS was created.
Even for diehard HP48 owners.
The fact that I have about 14 years experience using and programming a stack based RPN calculator is immeasurably helpful given that I need to become proficient with PS very rapidly. Yuri de Groot (Working on a top secret project for his own amusement)
