On Mon, 28 Aug 2006 22:38, Nick Rout wrote: > On Mon, 28 Aug 2006 22:09:41 +1200 > > Christopher Sawtell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: <snip>> > > > I hope discussing *BSD is not considered too off topic on linux-users, > > that I'll get harassed out of the community. > > > > Yes, I've has a brief play with KUbuntu, but was not sufficiently > > enamoured by it to make the change on my regular machine. > > > > -- > > CS > > excellent, we have given Chris the same answer! I too did the freebsd > install via pc-bsd. > > And no, it is not and has never been OT on this list to refer to *bsd. IMHO > it should stay that way. > > I installed openbsd once too, too long ago to usefully remember much about > it.
Well, when I first got into *nix, there were two choices of free *nix - 386BSD and Linux. Linux was somewhat cheaper at the time - it required a few less floppies. That's the only reason why I'm a regular Linux user and not a *BSD user today. I've never seen the point in "religious wars" on distros or OS types. Wesley Parish -- Clinersterton beademung, with all of love - RIP James Blish ------------- Mau ki ana, he aha te mea nui? You ask, "What is the most important thing?" Maku ki ana, he tangata, he tangata, he tangata. I reply, "It is people, it is people, it is people."
