On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 10:14 AM, Jim Cheetham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As I suspected, not many people have seem to be interested in the wiki ...
>
> On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 12:37 PM, Jim Cheetham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> My preferred solution would be to ask the Waikato LUG for a virtual
>> site on their wiki server [http://www.wlug.org.nz], as they have done
>> for NZLUG [http://wiki.linux.net.nz/]. In here we could maintain a
>> separate CLUG identity, and keep track of Canterbury-specific data.
>
> A couple of votes for this solution, but no comment from the people
> who would actually maintain the information. Page History for
> MeetingSchedule lists Zane, Rik, and some anonymous contributions.
>
>> The generic Linux info pages on the CLUG wiki should be contributed to
>> the WLUG wiki directly (they use a similar license).
>
> This seems to be accepted, and can be carried out independently.
> There aren't really many pages, but I imagine that most of the same
> content is already on WLUG. This means that someone has to do an
> intelligent job of searching WLUG and seeing what can sensibly be
> contributed. Any volunteers here?

Please don't go to any excessive bother over this exercise, because
now that intelligent 9 year-olds can successfully install Linux the
need for LUGs to act as support channels is 99.999% over. Like all the
others we seem to be busy converting CLUG into a somewhat  political
ginger-group cum social club for techo-geek nerds.

If the address changes from clug.{net,org}.nz please could you let me
know so I can get the changes propagated to the CINCH database held by
the Christchurch Public Library, and the Linux Counter project.

btw, It would be rather nice if members of the CLUG central cabal
could have mail forwarding from [EMAIL PROTECTED] organised.

Is that possible without too much trouble?

-- 
Sincerely etc.
Christopher Sawtell

Reply via email to