On Wed, 10 Feb 2010 10:11:47 Derek Smithies wrote: > On Tue, 9 Feb 2010, Christopher Sawtell wrote: > > What about settling on the 17 of the month. That's Wednesday next week > > to start it off. > > Sigh - - a group of geeks can surely come up with a better number than > 17. > > My first thought was for the 42nd of the month, but it is a bit large. > The 24 would work though. > 1, 2, 4, 8, 16 all fit nicely onto the topic. Shame that we can't use 0.
-- Quote of the login: Writing software is more fun than working.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
