On Tue, 9 Apr 2002 09:52:48 -0400 (EDT) Net Llama! <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 9 Apr 2002, dep wrote: > > begin Net Llama!'s quote: > > | This 'feature' is called static binaries. Its what prevents reuse > > | of common libraries, and leads to overall bloat. > > > > which must be why all those old dos apps wouldn't run on an 8088 with > > 640k and a 20-meg hd.<g> > > And think how much better they would have run, if shared libs were used > back then. > > -- > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > Lonni J Friedman [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Linux Step-by-step http://netllama.ipfox.com > > _______________________________________________ > Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users > Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL. Lonnie actually they ran better in OS/2 doswindow & windows apps ran better too. Go figure, well not really, OS/2 was a better windows than M$sludge. Big Time cheers -- Rick Sivernell Dallas, Texas 75287 972 306-2296 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Caldera Open Linux eWorkStation 3.1.1 Registered Linux User .~. / v \ /( _ )\ ^ ^ In Linux we trust! _______________________________________________ Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.
