The article header simply says, "SuSE 8.0 arrives without StarOffice." In the second paragraph it mentions that SsSE "...decided against including SO 6.0 after Sun began charging fees for the software."
http://netscape.com.com/2100-1104-893089.html?type=pt&part=netscape&tag= my&subj=technews Saying "...ships without StarOffice" and "...decided against including StarOffice 6.0," are not one and the same thing. That's my point. Regards, Glenn Williams - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Registered Linux User # 135678 - since 1994 ----- Original Message ----- From: "Joel Hammer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, April 28, 2002 11:08 AM Subject: Re: suse 8 article > Are you sure? I thought the article said SO 6.0 wasn't being shipped. > Joel > > On Sun, Apr 28, 2002 at 11:01:33AM -0600, Glenn Williams wrote: > > What's up with the author? > > > > That article is really strange. The mentioned article says SuSE 8.0 > > ships without StarOffice 5.2. I installed SuSE 8.0 Professional > > yesterday, and moments ago I clicked on the SO 5.2 icon on the desktop > > (installed by default), and SO 5.2 is being set up as I type this > > message. > _______________________________________________ > Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users > Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL. > _______________________________________________ Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.
