Bob Hemus wrote: > Ken Moffat wrote: > >>On Fri, 31 May 2002 20:22:44 -0600 >>Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> >>>2> Reading the writeups about Libranet, etc., I always came to the >>>conclusion that the package offerings were too damn old. >> >>Old and Stable. >>This is not always bad. It seems to be the debian way. >>But you have the option of changing the sources.list and going to the unstable or >testing versions; unstable is pretty much the standard to most distros, I think. >Debian has a different definition of stable. > > > Wasn't Debian the OS that powered the little moon crawler? > Bob
I don't believe so. I think it was running some kind of assembler on an embedded chip. -- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ L. Friedman [EMAIL PROTECTED] Linux Step-by-step & TyGeMo: http://netllama.ipfox.com 4:10pm up 43 days, 23:01, 4 users, load average: 0.13, 0.18, 0.35 _______________________________________________ Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.
