On Wed, 26 Jun 2002 18:01:46 -0400 (EDT) Gerry Doris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I just don't consider typing ./configure, make, make install to be some > kind of test of manhood. I'll compile the files if necessary but I like > the ease of use of rpm's. I prefer to update, remove, and rebuild > packages using rpm. However, I understand perfectly well why rpm's aren't > > always provided. Or at least a .spec file, and then you could type: make rpm, or better yet, a source rpm, so you could rmp --rebuild it. -- +============================+===============================+ | Roger Oberholtzer | E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | OPQ Systems AB | WWW: http://www.opq.se/ | | Erik Dahlbergsgatan 41-43 | Phone: Int + 46 8 314223 | | 115 32 Stockholm | Mobile: Int + 46 733 621657 | | Sweden | Fax: Int + 46 8 302602 | +============================+===============================+ _______________________________________________ Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.