Mozilla is critically flawed in that it has no search engine incorporated into it; unless you default load to a browser like netscape, with all its advertising cruft, or www.google or something like it. By itself it is totally useless unless you happen to have the http address of the site you want. If you want info on something like the Hykosis Kings try punching that into mozilla's search and you get a can't find server error message. It also has a rather nasty tendency to lockup on my box for no known reason. But, that might be because it doesn't like my particular box; so,I wouldn't fault it pending further evidence.
Net Llama! wrote: > Because Netscape *is* Mozilla (minus a few months), with added marketing & > advertising cruft. > > On Wed, 25 Sep 2002, Lee wrote: > > >>Believe the question dealt with netscape not mozilla. That is a matter >>of personal preference of which to use. If you haven't used it how would >>you know which is better? That's a little like a bible fundamentalist >>arguing against evolution even though he never a book about it. >> >>Net Llama! wrote: >> >>>I've goten Mozilla 1.0 & 1.1 to work under Caldera & Redhat. I have no >>>need nor desire to touch Netscape. >>> >>>On Wed, 25 Sep 2002, Tony Alfrey wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>>>Hi! >>>> >>>>Has anybody gotten netscape 7 to work and if so, on what distro? >>>>Thanks >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >> >>_______________________________________________ >>Linux-users mailing list >>[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc -> http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users >> > > _______________________________________________ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc -> http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
