m.w.chang wrote: > why didn't it made part of gcc? > >> Personally, I would leave libstdc++ library alone. It is used to >> statically link c++ code. > One lib is for creating static and is another for creating dynamic (Or at least that's the way I understand it...) Kurt is better qualified than myself to explain the how's and why's of this subject. He has written a couple of books on subject.
Best Peck -------- I don't need no stink'n sig.... _______________________________________________ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc -> http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
