So you're saying that InnoDB on MySQL is somewhat like ext3, an add-on to existing functionality rather than a fundamental change. This seems to fit MySQL's place in the market. It is useful for many people, since like ext3 InnoDB works well for basic functionality. It is not an Oracle killer, for that you need a different design.
>That's not native support. This is a M$ example of implementing >something that should be a _core_ part of the SQL server, not an >afterthought (oh, we forget transactions, well, just slap InnoDB on it). > Hey folks, we're having turkey salad, but we forgot the turkey, so just >slap some chicken on it. >MySQL is just a file system you can access w/ SQL commands -- an ext2 >filesystem at that. >SQL database == ACID compliant. MySQL != ACID compliant. _______________________________________________ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc -> http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
