On Tuesday 01 April 2003 10:56 am, Andrew Mathews wrote: > Harry G wrote: > > On Tuesday 01 April 2003 10:12 am, Stuart Biggerstaff wrote: > >>Not a P II? I thought the Pro topped out at 200. Intel had a P II 333 > >>upgrade for Pros > > > > That is what I did. Made a big difference, but I think I will have to > > bite the bullet soon and gete a new system. > > > > This one has been stone cold reliable, though. (a Dell) > > > > Thanks for your input! > > > > Harry G > > _______________________________________________ > > Yeah, PPro's are one of the best, even if not the fastest. My mirror is > on an HP Vectra running dual PPro Overdrive processors at 333Mhz with > all scsi disks. I don't have a reason to switch as long as it's doing an > adequate job. It serves up pages as fast as one of our dual Xeon Dells.
If I ever learn this Linux stuff well enough, maybe I will set it p as a server. Funny, I origionally bought it because I heard the P-Pro's were optimized for Windows NT (which I used in my business). Scary days! I also have a HP Netserver with dual P350's )(only one installed) I used for my server, with dual SCSI 9.5's that I paid something like $3900.00 for! It now sits idle under my desk. (Business crashed. NOTE: NEVER trust a friend in business. ) Harry G _______________________________________________ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc -> http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
