On Mon, 17 Nov 2003 12:59:35 +0100 Klaus-Peter Schrage <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Joel Hammer wrote: > > Well, I do this same sort of thing with convert. (It's part of the > > imagemagick package.) > > convert file.ps file.jpg and then import into SO. Works fine and can be > > scripted. But, I would really like to know why these eps files look fine > > in gv but so bad in SO. > > Bad? Didn't notice that. As a test, I loaded the notorious tiger.ps from > the ghostscript examples into GSview, converted it to a jpeg of 300 dpi > and imported this into an OO 1.1 text document - it looked and printed > fine. Klaus But shouldn't the postscript import take the encapsulated file directly? If you convert to jpeg, then you are not testing SO/OO postscript import. You are testing ghostscript's postscript parsing and SO/OO's jpeg import. Of course, SO/OO surely call ghostscript anyway. But, do they do so correctly? Is jpeg the format SO/OO use to store their imported postscript? -- +����������������������������+�������������������������������+ � Roger Oberholtzer � E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] � � OPQ Systems AB � WWW: http://www.opq.se/ � � Erik Dahlbergsgatan 41-43 � Phone: Int + 46 8 314223 � � 115 34 Stockholm � Mobile: Int + 46 733 621657 � � Sweden � Fax: Int + 46 8 302602 � +����������������������������+�������������������������������+ _______________________________________________ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc -> http://smtp.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
