On 02 Jul 2001 08:30:26 -0700, Aaron Grewell wrote: >They probably didn't. Source obfuscation is a time-honored tradition in >portscanning. Ah, but I got another tidbit on this today. Apparently I am not the only person this has happened to. People are finding port scans on 1178 from Microsoft.Com the day after a Windows Online update is executed on a regular basis. Anyone on the list have a Winblows box behind a firewall they'd like to test my theory on? stayler _______________________________________________ http://linux.nf -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives, Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest, Etc ->http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
- Re: Microsoft.Com scan on port 1178 Philip J. Koenig
- Re: Microsoft.Com scan on port 1178 Andrew Mathews
- Re: Microsoft.Com scan on port 1178 Shawn Tayler
- Re: Microsoft.Com scan on port 1178 Philip J. Koenig
- Re: Microsoft.Com scan on port 1178 Shawn Tayler
- Re: Microsoft.Com scan on port 1178 burns
- Re: Microsoft.Com scan on port 1178 Shawn Tayler
- Re: Microsoft.Com scan on port 1178 Zoki
- Re: Microsoft.Com scan on port 1178 Shawn Tayler
- Re: Microsoft.Com scan on port 1178 Warren Rasmussen
- Re: Microsoft.Com scan on port 1178 Federico Voges
- Re: Microsoft.Com scan on port 1178 Federico Voges
- Re: Microsoft.Com scan on port 1178 Zoki
- Re: Microsoft.Com scan on port 1178 Shawn Tayler
- Re: Microsoft.Com scan on port 1178 Federico Voges
